The Fact-checking Observatory is an automatic service that collects misinforming content on Twitter using URLs that have been identified as potential misinformation by fact-checking websites. Using this data, the Fact-checking Observatory automatically generates weekly reports that updates the state of misinformation spread of fact-checked misinformation on Twitter.

This analysis is limited to URLs identified by Fact-checking organisations. The collected data only consist of non-blocked Twitter content and may be incomplete.

This report updates the status of misinformation spread between Monday 08 May 2023 and Monday 15 May 2023.

256,486 Misinforming Tweets
New:+102 Trend:+56
93,200 Fact-checking Tweets
New:+64 Trend:-1
6,130 Fact-checks
144 Fact-checking Organisations

Key Content and Provenance

During the period between Monday 08 May 2023 and Monday 15 May 2023, 102 new URLs have been identified as potential misinforming content. Out of the 302 domains identified by Fact-checking organisations (Figure 1), most of the new shared URLs were from pbs.org with an increase of +84 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain The domain that saw the least increase in spread compared to the previous period total spread was 15min.lt with a change of +0 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain

In relation to the previous week, the domain that saw the biggest relative spread change was pbs.org with a change of +84 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain whereas the domain that saw the least relative change was sputniknews.lat with a change of -26 compared to the previous period.

The all time most important domain is twitter.com with a total of 183,778 URL shares and the least popular domain is 24-post.com with 1 shares (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Domain importance.

Figure 2: Amount of domains shares per week.

The top misinforming content and fact-checking articles shared since the last report are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.

Misinforming URL Fact-check URL Domain Current Week Previous Week Total
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/new-documentary-shows-ukrainians-fight-for-survival-devastation-of-war Check Your Fact pbs.org 84 0 84
https://rumble.com/v10miez-world-premiere-watch-the-water.html LeadStories rumble.com 5 0 6823
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202203/1254217.shtml StopFake.org globaltimes.cn 4 2 1621
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LQSYmda0Sc LeadStories youtube.com 2 1 9060
https://oroszhirek.hu/zaharova-valaszt-var-londontol-a-vezetekek-felrobbantasa-utan-uzent-truss-blinkennek-hogy-kesz/ euvsdisinfo.eu oroszhirek.hu 2 0 4
https://mlyn.by/05062022/bajden-ukraine-pridetsya-otdat-zemlyu-rossii-dlya-uregulirovaniya-voprosa-putem-peregovorov StopFake.org mlyn.by 2 0 3
https://sputniknews.lat/20230506/encuentran-en-lugansk-pruebas-de-que-kiev-preparaba-una-ofensiva-en-2022-1139123769.html euvsdisinfo.eu sputniknews.lat 1 25 26
https://doc.rt.com/filmy/donbass-deti/ euvsdisinfo.eu rt.com 1 0 70
https://smotrim.ru/video/2589597 euvsdisinfo.eu smotrim.ru 1 0 1
https://oroszhirek.hu/peszkov-az-egyesult-allamok-all-a-kreml-elleni-ukran-tamadas-mogott euvsdisinfo.eu oroszhirek.hu 0 6 6

Table 1: Top misinforming content.

Fact-check URL Domain Current Week Previous Week Total
https://factual.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33EQ6FX afp.com 13 0 13
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.326C94R afp.com 4 2 329
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33A99GQ afp.com 3 2 19
https://facta.news/notizia-falsa/2022/03/01/no-in-ucraina-non-ci-sono-laboratori-biomilitari-gestiti-dagli-stati-uniti/ facta.news 3 0 59
https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/coup-in-ukraine-in-2014 euvsdisinfo.eu 2 2 28
https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/russia-destroyed-a-secret-nato-bunker-in-ukraine euvsdisinfo.eu 2 2 4
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2022/07/12/us-finanzierung-von-46-biolaboren-in-der-ukraine-ist-bekannt-und-hat-nichts-mit-biowaffen-zu-tun/ correctiv.org 2 1 50
https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.32HR4QR afp.com 2 0 920
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/mar/18/tulsi-gabbard/tulsi-gabbard-falsely-claims-us-not-so-different-r/ politifact.com 2 0 556
https://www.stopfake.org/en/russia-isn-t-killing-anyone-fakes-from-an-american-writer-in-kyiv/ stopfake.org 2 0 39

Table 2: Top fact-checked content.

Fact-Checkers and Spreaders Location

The data used for creating the Twitter dataset is obtained from 144 fact-checking organisations.

The largest amount of fact-checked content comes from euvsdisinfo.eu (1,076 fact-checks) and the least from Verify Sy (1 fact-checks). Most fact-checked content are from VoxCheck (352) followed by Factcheck.ge (277) and AFP fact checking (263) (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Amount of fact-checks by fact-checkers.

Figure 4: Identified location of users spreading fact-checks and misinformation.

Locations and Mentions

Using automatic entity extraction methods, we identify key locations and persons mention in the fact-checking articles in order to identify what location and person are the most discussed in misinforming content.

The top mentioned locations and persons are listed in Table 3 and Table 4.

Location Description Current Week Previous Week Total
U [‘Country in eastern europe’]. 227 105 139358
E [‘Third planet from the sun in the solar system’]. 12 41 18943
M [‘Country in north america’]. 11 2 5628
S [‘Sculpture on liberty island in new york harbor in new york city, new york, united states’]. 8 6 8824
R [‘Statue in chadron, united states of america - frédéric auguste bartholdi - 1950’]. 7 19 8447
P [‘Country in central europe’]. 7 13 15827
B [‘Capital city of iraq’]. 6 7 14215
C [‘Region of europe’]. 5 4 6294
N [‘Most populous city in the united states of america’]. 4 2 5682
G [‘Country in central europe’]. 3 4 16005

Table 3: Top locations mentioned in misinforming posts.

Person Description Current Week Previous Week Total
U [‘President of the european commission since 2019’]. 84 1 5048
V [‘President of russia (1999–2008, 2012–present)’]. 24 26 63367
J [‘President of the united states since 2021’]. 5 1 15859
A [‘Austrian-born german politician, dictator of germany from 1933 until his death in 1945’]. 3 9 4840
O [‘Ukrainian politician and entertainer’]. 3 3 2187
B [‘King of thailand (1927-2016)’]. 3 1 6209
M [‘Ukrainian politician’]. 2 0 3237
P [‘266th pope of the catholic church’]. 2 0 2500
H [‘Ukrainian energy minister’]. 2 0 2295
T [‘First lady of south africa’]. 2 0 582

Table 4: Top people mentioned in misinforming posts.

Demographic Impact

Using automatic methods, Twitter account demographics are extracted for user age, gender and account type (i.e., identify if an account belong to an individual or organisation).

Figure 6 displays how misinformation and fact-checks are spread by different demographics.

Figure 5: Misinformation and Fact-check spread for different demographics. Top: Gender, Center: Age group, Bottom: Account type.

Data Collection and Methodology

The full methodology and information about the limitation and dataset used for this analysis can be accessed in the methodology page.