The Fact-checking Observatory is an automatic service that collects misinforming content on Twitter using URLs that have been identified as potential misinformation by fact-checking websites. Using this data, the Fact-checking Observatory automatically generates weekly reports that updates the state of misinformation spread of fact-checked misinformation on Twitter.

This analysis is limited to URLs identified by Fact-checking organisations. The collected data only consist of non-blocked Twitter content and may be incomplete.

This report updates the status of misinformation spread between Monday 10 April 2023 and Monday 17 April 2023.

256,239 Misinforming Tweets
New:+67 Trend:-168
92,917 Fact-checking Tweets
New:+200 Trend:+121
6,130 Fact-checks
144 Fact-checking Organisations

Key Content and Provenance

During the period between Monday 10 April 2023 and Monday 17 April 2023, 67 new URLs have been identified as potential misinforming content. Out of the 300 domains identified by Fact-checking organisations (Figure 1), most of the new shared URLs were from mythdetector.ge with an increase of +84 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain The domain that saw the least increase in spread compared to the previous period total spread was 15min.lt with a change of +0 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain

In relation to the previous week, the domain that saw the biggest relative spread change was mythdetector.ge with a change of +71 compared to the previous total spread for the same domain whereas the domain that saw the least relative change was rt.com with a change of -123 compared to the previous period.

The all time most important domain is twitter.com with a total of 183,769 URL shares and the least popular domain is 24-post.com with 1 shares (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Domain importance.

Figure 2: Amount of domains shares per week.

The top misinforming content and fact-checking articles shared since the last report are listed in Table 1 and Table 2.

Misinforming URL Fact-check URL Domain Current Week Previous Week Total
https://sputniknews.lat/20230416/defensa-rusa-periodistas-franceses-arriban-a-ucrania-para-realizar-una-operacion-de-falsa-bandera-1138220498.html euvsdisinfo.eu sputniknews.lat 40 0 40
https://twitter.com/runews/status/1622170096675299329 AFP Fact Check twitter.com 10 0 2448
https://oroszhirek.hu/brazil-elnok-az-usa-hagyjon-fel-az-ukrajnai-haboru-osztonzesevel-es-beszeljen-a-bekerol/ euvsdisinfo.eu oroszhirek.hu 3 0 3
https://twitter.com/TomacMarti/status/1537672340636676097 LeadStories twitter.com 2 0 16372
https://realrawnews.com/2022/03/putin-beheads-bioweapon-engineers-in-ukraine LeadStories realrawnews.com 2 0 588
https://oroszhirek.hu/zaharova-london-urangranatokkal-akarja-felperzselni-a-foldet-ukrajnaban/ euvsdisinfo.eu oroszhirek.hu 2 0 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGfZDBHaLvE euvsdisinfo.eu youtube.com 2 0 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LQSYmda0Sc LeadStories youtube.com 1 0 9057
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/ukrainian-is-a-part-of-russia-meaning-russia-can-enter-at-any-time LeadStories simonparkes.org 1 0 624
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2022/01/19/if-blinken-doesnt-want-a-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-why-is-he-provoking-one/ euvsdisinfo.eu paulcraigroberts.org 1 0 40

Table 1: Top misinforming content.

Fact-check URL Domain Current Week Previous Week Total
https://mythdetector.ge/en/real-creators-behind-the-ukrainian-pig-animation-distributed-in-the-name-of-an-israeli-channel/ mythdetector.ge 69 0 72
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2023/04/14/nein-ukrainische-gefluechtete-erhalten-keinen-250-euro-bonus-vom-jobcenter/ correctiv.org 34 0 34
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2023/04/12/nein-polnischer-tv-sender-berichtete-nicht-ueber-tatsaechliche-teilungsplaene-der-ukraine/ correctiv.org 16 0 16
https://www.stopfake.org/en/strong-fake-ukrainian-soldiers-bodies-found-in-polish-coal-mine-shafts-strong/ stopfake.org 6 0 12
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/25/tweets/there-are-no-us-run-biolabs-ukraine-contrary-socia/ politifact.com 5 2 2019
https://voxukraine.org/en/fake-russian-military-is-not-involved-in-the-mass-killings-of-civilians-in-bucha/ voxukraine.org 4 1 66
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2023/02/21/nein-das-verteidigungsministerium-wies-ukrainische-soldaten-nicht-via-plakat-auf-das-verbot-von-hakenkreuzen-hin/ correctiv.org 4 0 21
https://mythdetector.ge/en/is-london-gallery-about-to-remove-jan-van-eyck-s-painting-because-of-its-resemblance-to-putin/ mythdetector.ge 3 4 7
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2022/10/20/dieses-foto-zeigt-eine-demo-2013-in-der-ukraine-unter-anderem-mit-russischen-neonazis/ correctiv.org 3 0 62
https://faktencheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33D63QN afp.com 3 0 3

Table 2: Top fact-checked content.

Fact-Checkers and Spreaders Location

The data used for creating the Twitter dataset is obtained from 144 fact-checking organisations.

The largest amount of fact-checked content comes from euvsdisinfo.eu (1,076 fact-checks) and the least from Verify Sy (1 fact-checks). Most fact-checked content are from VoxCheck (352) followed by Factcheck.ge (277) and AFP fact checking (263) (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Amount of fact-checks by fact-checkers.

Figure 4: Identified location of users spreading fact-checks and misinformation.

Locations and Mentions

Using automatic entity extraction methods, we identify key locations and persons mention in the fact-checking articles in order to identify what location and person are the most discussed in misinforming content.

The top mentioned locations and persons are listed in Table 3 and Table 4.

Location Description Current Week Previous Week Total
U [‘Country in eastern europe’]. 261 297 138767
E [‘Third planet from the sun in the solar system’]. 82 136 18814
B [‘Capital city of iraq’]. 61 120 14144
G [‘Country in central europe’]. 59 139 15928
P [‘Country in central europe’]. 23 125 15752
S [‘Sculpture on liberty island in new york harbor in new york city, new york, united states’]. 17 132 8726
L [‘Sovereign state in western asia’]. 13 4 4661
M [‘Country in north america’]. 11 14 5587
I [‘Country in western asia’]. 11 2 24692
R [‘Statue in chadron, united states of america - frédéric auguste bartholdi - 1950’]. 6 9 8397

Table 3: Top locations mentioned in misinforming posts.

Person Description Current Week Previous Week Total
V [‘President of russia (1999–2008, 2012–present)’]. 37 20 63272
E [‘President of france since 2017’]. 13 4 8041
U [‘President of the european commission since 2019’]. 10 1 4960
J [‘President of the united states since 2021’]. 7 18 15852
D [‘President of the united states from 2017 to 2021’]. 4 4 5687
H [‘Ukrainian energy minister’]. 4 0 2284
B [‘King of thailand (1927-2016)’]. 2 3 6194
O [‘Ukrainian politician and entertainer’]. 2 1 2174
M [‘Ukrainian politician’]. 2 0 3231
I [‘British actor’]. 1 104 847

Table 4: Top people mentioned in misinforming posts.

Demographic Impact

Using automatic methods, Twitter account demographics are extracted for user age, gender and account type (i.e., identify if an account belong to an individual or organisation).

Figure 6 displays how misinformation and fact-checks are spread by different demographics.

Figure 5: Misinformation and Fact-check spread for different demographics. Top: Gender, Center: Age group, Bottom: Account type.

Data Collection and Methodology

The full methodology and information about the limitation and dataset used for this analysis can be accessed in the methodology page.